I found another pamphlet with folks locked up in the Tower with Lilburne borrowing some of his arguments. This time, it’s about the Lords not being allowed to try a commoner. What’s interesting is that this time, at least one of them (the only one I’ve checked up on), was a staunch Presbyterian, imprisoned for his role in the attempted 1647 counter-revolution. Yet even he borrows from Lilburne. I can see why Lilburne was considered to be so dangerous. He was infectious.
I had one other thought on Walker and Mabbott’s relationship. In one of his petitions to the Lords, Walker complained that Mabbott (among other things) would refuse to license some news items. Perhaps Walker’s distaste for Mabbott was simply due to Mabbott’s censorship of Walker. I’m not sure about that, though. I still need to think about some of the ramifications. The problem still seems to run deeper than that, especially considering Walker’s connections to the Headquarters. I’ll keep working on it.
I also ran across a pamphlet on the trial and execution of Sir Walter Raleigh. I’m sure it has import to early 1648, but I can’t quite tell what. Since it was licensed, my best guess is that was an attempt to show a particularly “tyrannical” proceeding (part of the campaign to get England ready to fight again), but it’s another thing I still need to think over. I tried to compare it to reprints of Strafford’s trial or Buckingham’s escapades, but it seems to be a wholly different animal.